A budget gamer for $1,200: HP Victus 15 RTX 5050 laptop review

A budget gamer for $1,200: HP Victus 15 RTX 5050 laptop review

At a current price of around $1,200, the review model Victus 15-fa2160ng doesn’t have it all its own way in a competitive market. Compared to other RTX 5050 laptops, the price is commendable and finds itself on the lower end of the scale. However, for a similar price, there’s also the Lenovo LOQ Essential 15, which, according to the spec sheet, aims to turn customer’s heads with a better display (100% sRGB). Unlike its Lenovo competitors, the Full HD IPS panel installed in the Victus 15 has to put up with a poor color gamut, which makes content appear rather washed out. To make matters worse, the first RTX 5060 laptops are already being sold at a relatively small premium, with some of them (depending on the application) offering a decent, if not earth-shattering performance boost. 

Basically, buyers will know what to expect in the $1,000 segment. The plastic case and speakers are of average quality, as are the battery capacity and connectivity (no USB 4). However, the upgrade options have turned out to be quite positive. In addition to two M.2 slots, the 15-inch model also includes two SO-DIMM banks. Noise and temperature production under load are also better than a number of competing devices.

Pros

+ consistent performance

+ two RAM as well as two SSD slots

+ moderate emissions

Cons

CPU somewhat outdated

limited color space

no card reader

The HP Victus 15-fa2160ng can be purchased on various online stores starting at around $1,200.

Processor

Intel Core i5-13420H 8 x 1.5 – 4.6 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Memory

24 GB 

, SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (one empty)

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, CMN1560, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU, 512 GB 

, NVMe-SSD, two M.2 2280 slots (one empty)

Soundcard

Intel Alder Point-M/P PCH – HD Audio

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Line-In/Out

Networking

Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8852BE (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 23.5 x 358 x 255 ( = 0.93 x 14.09 x 10.04 in)

Battery

70 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 Cells

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: HD 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200 W Power Supply, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.356 kg ( = 83.11 oz / 5.19 pounds), Power Supply: 660 g ( = 23.28 oz / 1.46 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

One area you shouldn’t expect particularly high quality is the case. The 15-inch devices’ surfaces are entirely made of plastic and tend to rattle here and there. The build quality, however, is beyond reproach, with all elements of the review device blending seamlessly together. The display’s maximum opening angle of around 135° is neither small nor especially large.

At 2.4 kg, the Victus 15 is more or less in line with its 15- and 16-inch counterparts, although the 17-inch Erazer Scout is just under 0.3 kg heavier. The HP laptop’s height of almost 2.4 cm (without its feet) is also not out of the ordinary.

Interfaces

The connectivity proves to be somewhat lacking. Buyers will not only have to do without modern USB protocols, but also without a card reader. However, the port distribution is quite well-designed, since they are located at the rear of the sides, and therefore hardly interfere during mouse use.

The installed Realtek Wi-Fi module (RTL8852BE) is somewhat faster than the MediaTek chip found in its predecessor, but it still can’t reach truly high speeds. Only the Erazer Scout’s performance managed to impress us in our test comparison field.

05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip

As with most laptops, the webcam quality is best left unsaid. Both the color accuracy and the image sharpness also leave a lot to be desired.

The laptop comes with a few information booklets and a 200-watt power supply.

The base plate is secured by seven small Phillips screws and several hooks, some of which are very tight. Under the hood, you have access to every component (see photos).

Unfortunately, HP still uses various plastic films for its packaging material.

The warranty in Germany covers 12 months.

The input devices are relatively good, without inspiring enthusiasm. The keyboard uses the entire width of the case and features a full-size numeric keypad and white, single-level backlighting. We’d describe the layout as a touch confusing – especially when it comes to the upper right corner and the position of the power button, as well as the “Insert,” “Print Screen,” and “Delete” keys. Some users may also long for larger arrows.

HP Victus 15

The touchpad delivers discreet performance. Its 12.5 x 8 cm surface offers solid gliding characteristics and is mostly responsive. However, the click surfaces tend to rattle – as is the case with numerous other laptops.

Unfortunately, the Victus 15 doesn’t boast a vivid display. Unlike some competitors, the 144 Hz panel is weak, particularly in terms of color coverage. While 64% sRGB is slightly better than its predecessor, it’s still pretty underwhelming.

296
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
283
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
324
cd/m²
292
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
313
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

CMN1560 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 324 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 303.1 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 324 cd/m²
Contrast: 1246:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 2.93
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
34.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
64.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
43% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
CCT: 7541 K

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
CMN1560, IPS, 1920×1080, 15.6″, 144 Hz
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
BOE094D, IPS, 1920×1080, 15.6″, 144 Hz
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920×1080, 17.3″, 144 Hz
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920×1080, 15.6″, 144 Hz
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AUODBB2, IPS, 1920×1200, 16″, 144 Hz
Display

-1%

-4%

70%

-2%

Display P3 Coverage (%)

43

39.2

-9%

37.7

-12%

67.3

57%

40

-7%

sRGB Coverage (%)

64.3

57.9

-10%

56.3

-12%

99.2

54%

58.1

-10%

AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)

34.7

40.5

17%

39

12%

69.1

99%

38.7

12%

Response Times

18%

25%

-13%

3%

Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)

28.6

In its factory state, the panel is generally not color-accurate due to having a strong blue hue, which can, however, be corrected by calibration.

Providing you don’t take the laptop outside or into the sun, the rest of the results are solid. This starts with a black level of 0.26 cd/m², which, combined with a brightness of approximately 300 cd/m², results in an IPS-typical contrast ratio of more than 1,200:1. Viewing angles and response times are also decent.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
20 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 10.7 ms rise
↘ 9.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28.6 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 13.4 ms rise
↘ 15.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

While the review configuration’s 24 GB of DDR5 RAM is quite respectable, at 512 GB, the SSD could be larger. HP is also using an outdated processor for price reasons.

Mode Silent Eco Standard Performance
Cyberpunk 2077 Noise 35 dB(A) 37 dB(A) 41 dB(A) 46 dB(A)
Cyberpunk 2077 Performance (FHD/Ultra) 38.7fps 56.7fps 67.3fps 71fps
Cyberpunk 2077 GPU Power Draw ~30 W ~60 W ~70 W ~80 W
Cinebench R15 Multi Score 1,422 points 839 points 1,703 points 1,756 points

In the meantime, the Core i5-13420H is a few years old and still manufactured using the outdated 10nm process. The Raptor Lake model contains four performance cores, including Hyper-Threading and eight efficiency cores without HT. This allows a total of 20 threads to be processed simultaneously. In the benchmark test, the Victus 15 ended up at the bottom of the test field, although the predecessor’s Core i5-13500H and the Core 5 210H found in the Scout 17 E1 are often only marginally faster. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 250 offers more than 30 % additional performance, and the Ryzen 9 8940HX housed in the Omen 16, almost 70 %.

0215430645860107512901505172019352150236525802795301032253440365538704085Tooltip
CPU Performance rating – Percent
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


85.1 pt

Average of class Gaming
 


84.7 pt

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


65.8 pt

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


55.3 pt

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -4!
Intel Core i5-13500H


51.8 pt

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
 


50.2 pt

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


49.1 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


27145 Points +145%

Average of class Gaming
  (5668 – 40970, n=145, last 2 years)





25153 Points +127%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


16154 Points +46%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


14081 Points +27%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


12609 Points +14%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


11084 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (8691 – 11871, n=4)





10374 Points -6%

Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 – 2267, n=145, last 2 years)





1978 Points +17%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


1917 Points +13%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


1767 Points +5%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


1704 Points +1%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (1673 – 1705, n=4)





1691 Points 0%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


1689 Points

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


1649 Points -2%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


10439 Points +146%

Average of class Gaming
  (2179 – 16108, n=144, last 2 years)





9687 Points +128%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


6320 Points +49%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


5345 Points +26%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


4855 Points +14%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


4252 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (3329 – 4524, n=4)





4079 Points -4%

CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 – 870, n=144, last 2 years)





764 Points +18%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


745 Points +15%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


694 Points +7%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


685 Points +6%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


655 Points +1%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (641 – 655, n=4)





649 Points 0%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


647 Points

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX




4296 (4037.14min – 4295.53max) Points +147%

Average of class Gaming
  (1537 – 6271, n=144, last 2 years)





3893 Points +124%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250




2544 (2446.48min – 2543.88max) Points +46%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H




2239 (1813.15min – 2238.76max) Points +29%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H





1850 (1711.45min – 1850.05max) Points +6%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H




1738 (1461.13min – 1737.69max) Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (1492 – 1815, n=4)





1679 Points -3%

CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (188.8 – 343, n=143, last 2 years)





293 Points +25%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


292 Points +24%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


279 Points +19%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


247 Points +5%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


243 Points +3%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (235 – 244, n=4)





240 Points +2%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


235 Points

Blender – v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (289 – 403, n=4)





330 Seconds * -3%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


319 Seconds *

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


265 Seconds * +17%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


260 Seconds * +18%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


204 Seconds * +36%

Average of class Gaming
  (80 – 517, n=140, last 2 years)





154.2 Seconds * +52%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


116 Seconds * +64%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


103455 MIPS +156%

Average of class Gaming
  (23795 – 148086, n=142, last 2 years)





91186 MIPS +126%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


63475 MIPS +57%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


52066 MIPS +29%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


45778 MIPS +13%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


40421 MIPS

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (35680 – 44970, n=4)





39427 MIPS -2%

7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


7407 MIPS +48%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


6485 MIPS +30%

Average of class Gaming
  (4199 – 7508, n=142, last 2 years)





6392 MIPS +28%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


5519 MIPS +10%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


5324 MIPS +6%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (5003 – 5331, n=4)





5214 MIPS +4%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


5003 MIPS

Geekbench 6.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 – 22104, n=142, last 2 years)





15595 Points +85%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


11447 Points +36%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


9956 Points +18%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


9453 Points +12%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (7216 – 9262, n=4)





8541 Points +1%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


8444 Points

Single-Core
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


2816 Points +26%

Average of class Gaming
  (1490 – 3253, n=142, last 2 years)





2778 Points +25%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


2586 Points +16%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (2231 – 2365, n=4)





2292 Points +3%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


2231 Points

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


2199 Points -1%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 – 27010, n=141, last 2 years)





16726 Points +114%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


13357 Points +71%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


9720 Points +24%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


8899 Points +14%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


7811 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (6895 – 8336, n=4)





7742 Points -1%

Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 – 2423, n=141, last 2 years)





2001 Points +26%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


1961 Points +24%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


1911 Points +21%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


1734 Points +10%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (1583 – 1669, n=4)





1631 Points +3%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


1583 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 – 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (7.7 – 44.3, n=142, last 2 years)





27.1 fps +124%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


25.7 fps +112%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


18.1 fps +50%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


14.6 fps +21%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


14.4 fps +19%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


12.1 fps

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (8.75 – 13.3, n=4)





11.5 fps -5%

LibreOffice – 20 Documents To PDF
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


69.8 s *

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


65.5 s * +6%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


64.1 s * +8%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (46.5 – 69.8, n=4)





59.5 s * +15%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


53.5 s * +23%

Average of class Gaming
  (19 – 88.8, n=141, last 2 years)





47.6 s * +32%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


45.9 s * +34%

R Benchmark 2.5 – Overall mean
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H


0.545 sec *

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (0.501 – 0.545, n=4)





0.521 sec * +4%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H


0.51 sec * +6%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H


0.4932 sec * +10%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250


0.4471 sec * +18%

Average of class Gaming
  (0.3551 – 0.759, n=143, last 2 years)





0.4281 sec * +21%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


0.4215 sec * +23%

* … smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

235 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1738 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

144.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

4252 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

647 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1689 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

11084 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core

518 Points

Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core

95 Points

Help

Performance rating
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


94.3 pt

Average of class Gaming
 


73.3 pt

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


57 pt

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


38.3 pt

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


37.2 pt

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


32.8 pt

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
 


32.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


43311 KRay/s +323%

Average of class Gaming
  (7192 – 85542, n=140, last 2 years)





28185 KRay/s +176%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


24656 KRay/s +141%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


12857 KRay/s +26%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


11489 KRay/s +12%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


10227 KRay/s

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (7922 – 11106, n=4)





9941 KRay/s -3%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


171374 Points +234%

Average of class Gaming
  (35040 – 252486, n=140, last 2 years)





127261 Points +148%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


98709 Points +92%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


61679 Points +20%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


57595 Points +12%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


51376 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (40587 – 59715, n=4)





51293 Points 0%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


7988 MB/s +224%

Average of class Gaming
  (1728 – 10389, n=140, last 2 years)





5850 MB/s +137%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


4563 MB/s +85%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


2621 MB/s +6%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


2468 MB/s

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (1724 – 2634, n=4)





2285 MB/s -7%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


2180 MB/s -12%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


169334 Points +143%

Average of class Gaming
  (50699 – 200651, n=140, last 2 years)





119677 Points +71%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


114915 Points +65%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


77835 Points +12%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


76434 Points +9%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (69803 – 74956, n=4)





71512 Points +2%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


69803 Points

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


26855 Points +308%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


14798 Points +125%

Average of class Gaming
  (5020 – 33636, n=140, last 2 years)





14395 Points +118%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


7538 Points +14%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


6589 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (5485 – 6625, n=4)





6330 Points -4%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


5715 Points -13%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


90684 Points +255%

Average of class Gaming
  (17585 – 134044, n=140, last 2 years)





65586 Points +157%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


53836 Points +111%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


28657 Points +12%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


26483 Points +4%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


25553 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (19684 – 27607, n=4)





24713 Points -3%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


150768 MB/s +205%

Average of class Gaming
  (19065 – 247074, n=140, last 2 years)





109362 MB/s +121%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


68090 MB/s +38%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


62657 MB/s +27%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (35531 – 93100, n=4)





56477 MB/s +14%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


51414 MB/s +4%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


49420 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


1784 MB/s +145%

Average of class Gaming
  (373 – 2531, n=140, last 2 years)





1532 MB/s +110%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


1074 MB/s +48%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


947 MB/s +30%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


728 MB/s

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (509 – 744, n=4)





674 MB/s -7%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


635 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


23193 KRay/s +316%

Average of class Gaming
  (3856 – 45446, n=140, last 2 years)





15086 KRay/s +171%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


13039 KRay/s +134%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


6106 KRay/s +9%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


5928 KRay/s +6%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


5577 KRay/s

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (4283 – 5831, n=4)





5353 KRay/s -4%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 – 62916, n=140, last 2 years)





42854 MPixel/s +92%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


37988 MPixel/s +70%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


26998 MPixel/s +21%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (12330 – 37044, n=4)





23774 MPixel/s +6%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


23228 MPixel/s +4%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


22348 MPixel/s

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


18283 MPixel/s -18%

The system’s performance is sometimes affected by its rather weak SSD (more on that later). Applications sometimes take a bit longer to launch or load than on comparable devices.

Performance rating
Average of class Gaming
 


92.3 pt

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


88.9 pt

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2!
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


80.8 pt

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 -4!
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


71.9 pt

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -5!
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


71 pt

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


65.7 pt

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
 


65.7 pt

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 – 9852, n=119, last 2 years)





8073 Points +39%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


8054 Points +38%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


7304 Points +25%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


6812 Points +17%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


5828 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





5828 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (8840 – 12600, n=123, last 2 years)





10754 Points +22%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


10709 Points +21%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


10292 Points +16%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


9521 Points +8%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


9067 Points +3%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


8840 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





8840 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


9831 Points +44%

Average of class Gaming
  (6662 – 14612, n=119, last 2 years)





9830 Points +44%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


9226 Points +35%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


8890 Points +30%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


6845 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





6845 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (7440 – 19351, n=119, last 2 years)





13674 Points +54%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


13465 Points +52%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


11137 Points +25%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


10134 Points +14%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


8879 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





8879 Points 0%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 – 2344, n=114, last 2 years)





1984 Points +45%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


1903 Points +39%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


1746 Points +28%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


1618 Points +18%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


1366 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





1366 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 – 2211, n=114, last 2 years)





1863 Points +34%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


1831 Points +32%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


1764 Points +27%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


1585 Points +14%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


1386 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





1386 Points 0%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 – 2729, n=114, last 2 years)





2215 Points +60%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


2112 Points +52%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


1757 Points +27%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


1706 Points +23%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


1387 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





1387 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 – 2330, n=114, last 2 years)





1736 Points +39%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


1664 Points +33%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


1562 Points +25%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


1471 Points +18%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


1249 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





1249 Points 0%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


322 Points +30%

Average of class Gaming
  (237 – 532, n=117, last 2 years)





315 Points +28%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


267 Points +8%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


247 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





247 Points 0%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (176.4 – 345, n=113, last 2 years)





284 Points +26%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


253 Points +12%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


240 Points +6%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


226 Points

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





226 Points 0%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


577 ms *

Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (n=1)





577 ms * -0%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


545 ms * +6%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


543 ms * +6%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


534 ms * +7%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


509 ms * +12%

Average of class Gaming
  (397 – 674, n=127, last 2 years)





473 ms * +18%

* … smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score 5828 points

Help

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 – 104987, n=140, last 2 years)





70703 MB/s +109%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


58240 MB/s +72%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


44253 MB/s +31%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (22003 – 59609, n=4)





37838 MB/s +12%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


35838 MB/s +6%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


33849 MB/s

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


29102 MB/s -14%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (22956 – 104349, n=140, last 2 years)





73602 MB/s +97%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


58128 MB/s +56%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


46858 MB/s +26%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (23759 – 68085, n=4)





42242 MB/s +13%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


37325 MB/s

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


35634 MB/s -5%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


30770 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22297 – 133486, n=140, last 2 years)





72141 MB/s +103%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


58085 MB/s +63%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


46904 MB/s +32%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


42376 MB/s +19%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (21429 – 62529, n=4)





38997 MB/s +10%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


35568 MB/s

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


32239 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


103.6 ns *

Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 – 259, n=140, last 2 years)





101.6 ns * +2%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop


99.9 ns * +4%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


98.4 ns * +5%

Average Intel Core i5-13420H
  (90.2 – 103.6, n=4)





96.6 ns * +7%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU


87.5 ns * +16%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop


83.5 ns * +19%

* … smaller is better

Latency is also less than perfect. The LatencyMon tool identified potential issues for certain applications.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon – interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H, Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


4787 μs * -29%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


3702 μs *

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


3622 μs * +2%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


1425.3 μs * +61%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


1229.6 μs * +67%

* … smaller is better

As previously mentioned, the SSD isn’t among the fastest models. It achieved solid sequential results and didn’t throttle in the loop test. This is an area where most of the competitors still have their noses in front – even its predecessor.

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
4987 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2844 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
461.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
443.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq:
2146 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq:
2757 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
61.31 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
150.9 MB/s

Drive Performance rating – Percent
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


91 pt

Average of class Gaming
 


77.9 pt

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


68.6 pt

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


61.4 pt

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


60.8 pt

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
 


52.4 pt

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


49.2 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




3632 (3569.55min – 3631.92max) MB/s +55%

Average of class Gaming
  (281 – 8300, n=125, last 2 years)





3495 MB/s +49%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1





3031 (2761.74min – 3031.45max) MB/s +29%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





2866 (2793.62min – 2866.04max) MB/s +22%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T




2751 (2717.09min – 2750.83max) MB/s +17%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (2348 – 2738, n=2)





2543 MB/s +8%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU




2348 (1978.66min – 2347.68max) MB/s

seq write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




5256 (5197.58min – 5255.67max) MB/s +84%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T





4251 (3917.4min – 4251.35max) MB/s +49%

Average of class Gaming
  (1247 – 9699, n=125, last 2 years)





3986 MB/s +40%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1





3704 (3259.18min – 3704.34max) MB/s +30%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





3526 (3357.33min – 3526.44max) MB/s +24%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (2853 – 2887, n=2)





2870 MB/s +1%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU





2853 (2754.08min – 2853.34max) MB/s

seq q8 t1 read
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1




7258 (6649.77min – 7257.61max) MB/s +44%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN





7004 (5842.1min – 7004.24max) MB/s +39%

Average of class Gaming
  (2644 – 15056, n=125, last 2 years)





6911 MB/s +37%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





6270 (5201.78min – 6270.02max) MB/s +25%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T





5846 (5427.01min – 5846.07max) MB/s +16%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU





5029 (4142.71min – 5029.17max) MB/s

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (5008 – 5029, n=2)





5019 MB/s 0%

seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




6103 (6005.82min – 6102.92max) MB/s +118%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1




5750 (5600.99min – 5749.76max) MB/s +105%

Average of class Gaming
  (1281 – 13519, n=125, last 2 years)





5564 MB/s +99%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T





5471 (5285.79min – 5471.43max) MB/s +95%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





5013 (4747.47min – 5013.45max) MB/s +79%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (2801 – 2873, n=2)





2837 MB/s +1%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU





2801 (2775.9min – 2801.17max) MB/s

4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




76.5 (75.54min – 76.49max) MB/s +24%

Average of class Gaming
  (32.2 – 110.2, n=125, last 2 years)





69.3 MB/s +12%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (61.8 – 61.9, n=2)





61.9 MB/s 0%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU





61.8 (60.32min – 61.82max) MB/s

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T




61.6 (60.1min – 61.6max) MB/s 0%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G




58 (56.64min – 57.95max) MB/s -6%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1




51.7 (50.4min – 51.66max) MB/s -16%

4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




247 (242.52min – 246.64max) MB/s +63%

Average of class Gaming
  (78 – 397, n=125, last 2 years)





211 MB/s +39%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T





179.1 (173.23min – 179.12max) MB/s +18%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (152 – 170.2, n=2)





161.1 MB/s +6%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU




152 (148.54min – 152max) MB/s

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G




137.8 (136.03min – 137.79max) MB/s -9%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1




96.7 (95.77min – 96.65max) MB/s -36%

4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




4137 (4111.19min – 4136.71max) MB/s +341%

Average of class Gaming
  (417 – 8067, n=125, last 2 years)





2574 MB/s +174%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T




2354 (2337.78min – 2354max) MB/s +151%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (939 – 1751, n=2)





1345 MB/s +43%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU





939 (881.99min – 939.36max) MB/s

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1





889 (844.18min – 889.18max) MB/s -5%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





864 (769.87min – 864.23max) MB/s -8%

4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN




3371 (3357.07min – 3370.53max) MB/s +556%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T




2348 (2236.98min – 2347.75max) MB/s +357%

Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 – 5653, n=125, last 2 years)





2158 MB/s +320%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (514 – 1626, n=2)





1070 MB/s +108%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU




514 (503.15min – 513.84max) MB/s

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G





452 (444.25min – 452.18max) MB/s -12%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1




356 (352.83min – 355.66max) MB/s -31%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


8387 Points +124%

Average of class Gaming
  (2858 – 13854, n=123, last 2 years)





6906 Points +84%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


5084 Points +36%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


4983 Points +33%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


4745 Points +27%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (3745 – 3775, n=2)





3760 Points 0%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


3745 Points

Score Read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


3093 Points +169%

Average of class Gaming
  (953 – 4418, n=123, last 2 years)





2375 Points +107%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


1672 Points +46%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


1384 Points +21%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


1331 Points +16%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (1148 – 1479, n=2)





1314 Points +14%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


1148 Points

Score Write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


3725 Points +81%

Average of class Gaming
  (1375 – 7208, n=123, last 2 years)





3375 Points +64%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


3046 Points +48%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


2843 Points +38%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


2555 Points +24%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


2059 Points

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (1608 – 2059, n=2)





1834 Points -11%

Seq Read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


5402.1 MB/s +66%

Average of class Gaming
  (2272 – 9890, n=123, last 2 years)





5274 MB/s +63%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


5161.69 MB/s +59%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


4595 MB/s +42%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


4523.34 MB/s +39%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (3245 – 3935, n=2)





3590 MB/s +11%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


3244.89 MB/s

Seq Write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


5036.34 MB/s +166%

Average of class Gaming
  (114.5 – 9926, n=123, last 2 years)





3941 MB/s +108%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


3249 MB/s +71%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


2706.08 MB/s +43%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


2348.36 MB/s +24%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (1896 – 2410, n=2)





2153 MB/s +14%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


1896.49 MB/s

4K Read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


79.42 MB/s +30%

Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 – 108.4, n=123, last 2 years)





68.5 MB/s +12%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


61.02 MB/s

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


58.8 MB/s -4%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


58.66 MB/s -4%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


56.57 MB/s -7%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (50 – 61, n=2)





55.5 MB/s -9%

4K Write
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


251.38 MB/s +35%

Average of class Gaming
  (75.6 – 512, n=123, last 2 years)





218 MB/s +17%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


189.4 MB/s +2%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


185.71 MB/s

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


180.28 MB/s -3%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (153.7 – 185.7, n=2)





169.7 MB/s -9%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


75.56 MB/s -59%

4K-64 Read
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


2473.44 MB/s +224%

Average of class Gaming
  (517 – 3630, n=123, last 2 years)





1781 MB/s +134%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


1160.79 MB/s +52%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (763 – 1036, n=2)





899 MB/s +18%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


866 MB/s +14%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


762.74 MB/s

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


758.5 MB/s -1%

4K-64 Write
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


3146.3 MB/s +87%

Average of class Gaming
  (991 – 5909, n=123, last 2 years)





2766 MB/s +64%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


2532 MB/s +50%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


2392.18 MB/s +42%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


2068.42 MB/s +23%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


1683.79 MB/s

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (1213 – 1684, n=2)





1448 MB/s -14%

Access Time Read
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


0.146 ms *

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (0.051 – 0.146, n=2)





0.0985 ms * +33%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


0.098 ms * +33%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


0.095 ms * +35%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


0.075 ms * +49%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


0.069 ms * +53%

Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 – 0.379, n=123, last 2 years)





0.05744 ms * +61%

Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 – 0.277, n=123, last 2 years)





0.04041 ms * -102%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1


0.022 ms * -10%

Average Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
  (0.02 – 0.023, n=2)





0.0215 ms * -8%

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G


0.021 ms * -5%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU


0.02 ms *

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN


0.019 ms * +5%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T


0.015 ms * +25%

* … smaller is better

036573010951460182521902555292032853650401543804745511054755840620565706935Tooltip

HP has opted to use a limited TGP for its graphics card. While the RTX 5050 in the Scout 17 E1 runs at a maximum of 115 watts, the Victus 15 only uses a maximum of 80 watts, something clearly evident from the measurements. Medion’s competitor gains a few percent in 3DMark tests, although the predecessor’s RTX 4050 lags behind by about 15%. Meanwhile, the RTX 5060 achieves an increase of 18 to 27%.

3DMark 11 Performance 25519 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score 50444 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score 22488 points
3DMark Time Spy Score 9098 points

Help

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H


30 Seconds * -7%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core 5 210H


29 Seconds * -4%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (28 – 29, n=2)





28.5 Seconds * -2%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core i5-13420H


28 Seconds *

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250


21 Seconds * +25%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


21 Seconds * +25%

Average of class Gaming
  (9 – 95, n=139, last 2 years)





19.2 Seconds * +31%

v3.3 Classroom CUDA
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-13500H


52 Seconds * -4%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core 5 210H


50 Seconds * -0%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Intel Core i5-13420H


50 Seconds *

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (50 – 50, n=2)





50 Seconds * -0%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 7 250


38 Seconds * +24%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX


38 Seconds * +24%

Average of class Gaming
  (15 – 110, n=140, last 2 years)





31.9 Seconds * +36%

* … smaller is better

You shouldn’t expect the RTX 5050 to exceed its native 1,920 x 1,080 pixels when gaming, but if you exclude extremely demanding or poorly optimized games such as Oblivion Remastered and Borderlands 4, most titles run smoothly in Full HD even at maximum settings. Anyone seeking higher frame rates could consider upscaling in addition to reducing the detail level. Using DLSS Quality, for example, the frame rate in Battlefield 6 rose from 54 to 69fps, and with quadruple frame generation, it even peaked at 149fps, although subjectively the image appeared very uneven.

Performance rating – Percent
Average of class Gaming
 


99 pt

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX


88.9 pt

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250


80.7 pt

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H


75.5 pt

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
 


71.6 pt

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H


66.3 pt

Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.7 – 169.9, n=141, last 2 years)





101.1 fps +42%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




88.6 (71min) fps +25%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX




86.6 (59min) fps +22%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




76.9 (63min) fps +8%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (71 – 76.9, n=3)





74.4 fps +5%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




71 (56min) fps

Baldur’s Gate 3 – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (37.2 – 246, n=107, last 2 years)





134.8 fps +68%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX


109.1 fps +36%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




101 (49.2min, 62.3P0.1, 91.9P1) fps +26%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




86.3 (77.3min, 77.6P0.1, 78.9P1) fps +7%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (80.4 – 86.3, n=3)





82.5 fps +3%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




80.4 (32.8min, 47.1P0.1, 69.4P1) fps

GTA V – 1920×1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX




127.5 (2.93min, 83.3P1) fps +45%

Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 – 186.9, n=130, last 2 years)





124.3 fps +41%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




117.6 (27.6min, 83.3P1) fps +33%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




108.7 (8.82min, 76.9P1) fps +23%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (88.1 – 117.6, n=3)





106.2 fps +21%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




88.1 (18min, 55.6P1) fps

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark – 1920×1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 – 215, n=141, last 2 years)





135.9 fps +58%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250


118.1 fps +37%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX


111 fps +29%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H


102 fps +18%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (86.2 – 102, n=3)





96.2 fps +12%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H


86.2 fps

Strange Brigade – 1920×1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 – 456, n=129, last 2 years)





260 fps +50%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




223 (32.5min, 170P1) fps +29%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX




217.8 (86.3min, 152.5P1) fps +26%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




189.6 (107.2min, 138.3P1) fps +9%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (173.4 – 189.7, n=3)





184.2 fps +6%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




173.4 (80.7min, 122.2P1) fps

Dota 2 Reborn – 1920×1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX




161.6 (132.4min) fps +39%

Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 – 248, n=143, last 2 years)





154.3 fps +33%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




121.5 (104.6min) fps +5%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




119.9 (92.2min) fps +3%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (116.2 – 119.9, n=2)





118.1 fps +2%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




116.2 (96.1min) fps

X-Plane 11.11 – 1920×1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (33.4 – 150.2, n=146, last 2 years)





103.9 fps +59%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R9 8940HX


93.9 fps +43%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H


77.1 fps +18%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250


72.1 fps +10%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (65.5 – 77.1, n=2)





71.3 fps +9%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H


65.5 fps

Performance rating – Percent
Average of class Gaming
 


100 pt

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250


73.9 pt

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H


72.1 pt

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
 


67.4 pt

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H


62.5 pt

The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (22.9 – 61.9, n=15, last 2 years)





39.4 fps +72%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




26.5 (9.18min, 9.5P0.1, 13.9P1) fps +16%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




25 (4.14min, 6.43P0.1, 18.6P1) fps +9%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (22.9 – 25, n=2)





24 fps +5%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




22.9 (6.7min, 7.24P0.1, 11.7P1) fps

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (46.8 – 130.3, n=14, last 2 years)





82 fps +75%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




61.1 (48.6min, 48.8P0.1, 50.9P1) fps +31%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




51.6 (41.3min, 42P0.1, 43.1P1) fps +10%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (46.8 – 51.6, n=2)





49.2 fps +5%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




46.8 (31min, 31.9P0.1, 38.7P1) fps

Stalker 2 – 1920×1080 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (33.8 – 147.6, n=17, last 2 years)





57.6 fps +70%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




42 (18.3min, 21.8P0.1, 29.9P1) fps +24%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




39.9 (30.4min, 30.4P0.1, 33.2P1) fps +18%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (33.8 – 39.9, n=2)





36.9 fps +9%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




33.8 (24.5min, 24.6P0.1, 25.7P1) fps

Space Marine 2 – 1920×1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (52.8 – 108, n=15, last 2 years)





79 fps +50%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




70.8 (46.3min, 51P0.1, 58.1P1) fps +34%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




65.2 (45.7min, 49P0.1, 50P1) fps +23%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (52.8 – 70.8, n=2)





61.8 fps +17%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




52.8 (26min, 28.7P0.1, 35.8P1) fps

Senua’s Saga Hellblade 2 – 1920×1080 High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (33.9 – 86.1, n=17, last 2 years)





53.1 fps +57%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




40.8 (37min, 37.6P0.1, 38.2P1) fps +20%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




35.1 (32.4min, 32.6P0.1, 33.5P1) fps +4%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (33.9 – 35.1, n=2)





34.5 fps +2%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




33.9 (23.3min, 27.8P0.1, 31.1P1) fps

Horizon Forbidden West – 1920×1080 Very High Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (14.7 – 140.3, n=21, last 2 years)





76.2 fps +42%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 5 210H




62 (50min, 50.3P0.1, 51P1) fps +15%

Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
  (53.8 – 62, n=2)





57.9 fps +8%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H




53.8 (33.4min, 37P0.1, 41.8P1) fps

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250




52.9 (35.4min, 36.5P0.1, 40.5P1) fps -2%

One positive aspect in the long-term test with Cyberpunk 2077 was the absence of any anomalies relating to throttling or the like.

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip

In 3D-based operations, the Victus 15 is quieter than the competition, although the average recorded noise level of 46 dB(A) during Cyberpunk 2077 is by no means quiet. Compared to its predecessor, the noise levels under load don’t seem to have increased. When the laptop is inactive, the fans are still constantly active in performance mode, reaching just under 30 dB(A).

Noise level

Idle

28 / 29 / 30 dB(A)

Load 40 / 48 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 

30 dB
silent

40 dB(A)
audible

50 dB(A)
loud

 

min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2048.341.140.838.441.72539.538.536.535.938.43142.747.344.243.445.24029.931.229.631.530.85036.627.230.528.835.56326.624.734.924.131.78019.618.317.515.626.410021.517.517.315.825.912523.718181628.61602619.419.917.128.12002824.722.622.230.62502620.320.116.129.531526.717.219.213.131.14003023.420.911.933.850030.82221.911.336.663028.818.419.610.735.480029.417.119.71136100029.714.41911.236.9125030.413.918.110.537.4160029.113.3171136.9200028.713.617.511.537250028.514.317.811.837.7315027.214.117.612.435.1400027.312.916.312.434.4500027.413.113.312.633.9630023.4131312.735.180001913.413.212.931.31000016.713.513.112.725.91250014.91312.912.321.91600013.212.111.911.718.9SPL4027.929.724.347.7N3.411.20.66.2median 27.3median 14.3median 17.8median 12.4median 33.9Delta3.82.72.91.74hearing rangehide median Fan Noise

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Noise

-2%

-9%

-32%

1%

off / environment * (dB)

24

25

-4%

24

-0%

25

-4%

23

4%

Idle Minimum * (dB)

28

29

-4%

27

4%

43

-54%

23

18%

Idle Average * (dB)

29

30

-3%

29

-0%

45

-55%

23

21%

Idle Maximum * (dB)

30

31

-3%

32

-7%

48

-60%

27.64

8%

Load Average * (dB)

40

40

-0%

47

-18%

53

-33%

49.5

-24%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB)

46

55

-20%

51

-11%

49.5

-8%

Load Maximum * (dB)

48

48

-0%

58

-21%

53

-10%

52.73

-10%

Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)

42

* … smaller is better

 The perfectly acceptable maximum case temperatures on the top and bottom of 43°C are quite moderate. In idle mode, most areas remain below the 30°C mark.

  38 °C
100 F
43 °C
109 F
42 °C
108 F
 
  29 °C
84 F
40 °C
104 F
37 °C
99 F
 
  23 °C
73 F
27 °C
81 F
28 °C
82 F
 
Maximum: 43 °C = 109 F
Average: 34.1 °C = 93 F
43 °C
109 F
42 °C
108 F
37 °C
99 F
39 °C
102 F
41 °C
106 F
27 °C
81 F
28 °C
82 F
27 °C
81 F
23 °C
73 F
Maximum: 43 °C = 109 F
Average: 34.1 °C = 93 F

Power Supply (max.)  42 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).

The components also don’t get excessively hot, and the CPU and GPU settled to 74 °C and 77 °C, in the stress test using the Furmark and Prime95 tools.

When it comes to sound quality, the Victus 15 outperforms the Erazer Scout 17. Overall, however, the sound can still only be described as mid-range. As is very often the case, the bass is particularly lacking.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.448.92535.941.83143.448.94031.532.45028.828.36324.127.28015.620.610015.820.91251632.116017.139.420022.247.825016.155.931513.159.640011.965.550011.365.963010.767.78001165.9100011.266.4125010.568.816001171.1200011.573.1250011.869.5315012.467.8400012.470.9500012.674.9630012.772.4800012.973.41000012.774.51250012.360.91600011.755.7SPL24.383N0.656.6median 12.4median 66.4Delta1.77.535.53734.435.143.842.93030.725.624.424.125.915.72213.120.113.330.514.839.918.148.613.854.312.952.213.457.213.158.912.164.211.370.811.267.611.363.711.560.111.562.612.46812.56512.767.913.459.213.459.113.251.51347.412.54812.155.824.676.80.637.2median 12.9median 58.90.67.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

Thanks in no small part to its limited TGP, the 15-inch model is generally more economical than the competition. 8 to 13 watts in idle mode and 78 to 187 watts under load are acceptable for the performance on offer.

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption

-2%

-41%

-52%

-28%

-76%

Idle Minimum * (Watt)

7.9

5

37%

13.5

-71%

20

-153%

7.8

1%

Idle Average * (Watt)

9.2

9

2%

14.8

-61%

20.7

-125%

8.8

4%

Idle Maximum * (Watt)

13.5

22

-63%

22.9

-70%

22.7

-68%

21.5

-59%

Load Average * (Watt)

78

72

8%

87

-12%

71

9%

119

-53%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt)

128.4

173.4

-35%

153.1

-19%

192

-50%

Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt)

126.7

171.9

-36%

151.1

-19%

164.5

-30%

Load Maximum * (Watt)

187

176

6%

195

-4%

172

8%

208

-11%

Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)

113

* … smaller is better

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip

The runtime test was conducted using balanced mode. Interestingly, despite the identical battery capacity of 70 Wh, the runtime was significantly worse than its predecessor. Instead of around 7.5 hours, the new Victus 15 only kept going for just under 4 hours while surfing the internet, and this is comparable to both the Scout 17 E1 and the Lenovo LOQ 15.

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 53 Wh
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery runtime

74%

-9%

5%

16%

52%

WiFi v1.3 (h)

4.3

7.5

74%

3.9

-9%

4.5

5%

5

16%

Reader / Idle (h)

6.9

Load (h)

1.3

1.3

H.264 (h)

5.1

With the RTX 5050 and RTX 5060 laptop prices often being quite similar, things are currently hot in the $1,000 segment. Before purchasing the Victus 15, you should be aware that HP has achieved this moderate price as a result of various cost-cutting measures, including the display.

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
– 10/24/2025 v8

Florian Glaser

Connectivity

56 / 80 → 70%

Application Performance

77%

Gaming – Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
25%

Power Use
76.8%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
22.3%

Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 29%

Image

Model / Review

Price

Weight

Height

Display

1.

75.8%

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘
24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $885.00
HP Victus 15 Intel i5-13420H…
2. $649.00
HP Victus 15 Gaming Laptop 1…
3. $899.00
HP Victus 15.6″ FHD 144Hz Ga…
List Price: 1000 EUR
2.4 kg 23.5 mm 15.60″
1920×1080
141 PPI
IPS

2.

84% v7 (old)

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng

HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
Intel Core i5-13500H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. 
15.6″ FHD 1920(RGB)*1080 144…
2. $12.00
RAKSTORE Laptop CPU Cooling …
3. $129.99
WARWOLFTEAM New Screen Compa…
List Price: 1000 EUR
2.3 kg 24 mm 15.60″
1920×1080
141 PPI
IPS

3.

76.8%

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
Intel Core 5 210H ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB
List Price: 1250 EUR 2.7 kg 26 mm 17.30″
1920×1080
127 PPI
IPS

4.

77.5%

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10

Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10
AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $1,569.00
Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15…
2. $37.99
Ruilezyo 300W Laptop Charger…
3. $101.68
New KrystalPix LCD Display F…
2.4 kg 24 mm 15.60″
1920×1080
141 PPI
IPS

5.

82.5%

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng

HP Omen 16-ap0091ng
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘
16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $19.99
BestParts New CPU+GPU Coolin…
2. $16.99
Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling …
3. $35.99
Replacement Backlit Keyboard…
List Price: 1500 Euro
2.4 kg 23.7 mm 16.00″
1920×1200
162 PPI
IPS

More articles related to this device

HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (Victus 15 Series)

Related Articles

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Florian Glaser, 2025-10-27 (Update: 2025-10-27)

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *