Flagship power with an XXL battery

Flagship power with an XXL battery

In our tests, the Honor Magic8 Pro proved itself to be a nearly complete flagship device, impressing us with its premium build quality, IP69K certification, and a vibrant LTPO OLED display boasting brightness of over 6,000 cd/m². The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 delivers excellent performance, though it throttles noticeably under sustained load. Other highlights include the seven-year update guarantee, versatile AI features (including an AI button), and comprehensive security options that include an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor and 3D facial recognition.

The camera impressed us with detailed photos, a powerful periscope zoom, and good image stabilization, even if its predecessor’s variable aperture is missing and the default settings tend towards bright, vibrant images. Despite the EU downsizing, the 6,270 mAh battery offers excellent battery life and recharges quickly at up to 100 watts. Weaknesses such as the currently slow Wi-Fi 7 and the lack of a UWB chip detract slightly from the overall impression, but don’t diminish the Magic8 Pro’s status as a very attractive Android flagship.

Pros

+ high-level performance

+ comprehensive IP certification

+ long-term update support

+ very good battery life

+ good camera setup

+ 3D face recognition and an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor

Cons

no UWB

smaller battery in Europe

significant dip in performance under load

no barometer

The Magic8 Pro has been available in Asia for some time (as we previously reported), and now it makes its appearance as the worldwide successor to the Magic7 Pro. Unfortunately, the European version comes with a significantly smaller battery and is also limited in terms of its storage options.

Nevertheless, the battery is comparatively large and promises long battery life. In the UK, the smartphone is only available in the storage configuration reviewed here, and has a suggested retail price of around £1,049.

Display

6.71 inch 20:9, 2808 x 1256 pixel 458 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, 4320Hz PWM Dimming, LTPO 1 – 120 Hz, NanoCrystal Shield, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 

, 484.39 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.3 x 161.2 x 75 ( = 0.33 x 6.35 x 2.95 in)

Battery

6270 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode, two cells

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (1/1.3″, f/1.6, 23 mm, OIS) + 200 MPix (3.7x optical zoom, 1/1.4″, f/2.6, 85 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide / Macro, f/2.0, 12 mm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0, 21 mm) + 3D Depth Camera

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, USB-C-Cabel, SIM-Tool, MagicOS 10, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LC3, LHDC 5.0, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B2a, B2b, B1C), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid | DRM Widevine L1 | up to 2 Nano-SIM, up to 2 eSIM | IP68 / / IP69 / IP69K | USB Copy Test: 395.9 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: 1.0 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.97 W/kg | max. charging speed: 100 W (wired) / 80 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof

Weight

219 g ( = 7.73 oz / 0.48 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

Every color (image source: Daniel Schmidt)
Every color

The Honor Magic8 Pro is available in black, Sunrise Gold, and Sky Cyan and has a nominal thickness of 8.3 mm (we measured 8.45 mm), or 14.4 mm including the camera. This makes it slightly slimmer than the previous model, the Magic7 Pro, when the camera is excluded, or up to 13.35 mm including the camera.

The matte frame gives the Magic8 Pro a more premium look and makes it less prone to fingerprints. The build quality is impressive, with consistent and tight gaps between the components. When twisted, the smartphone only creaks slightly.

The Magic8 Pro is IP69K certified, meaning it is dustproof and protected against immersion in water, steam, and high-pressure cleaning.

The Magic8 Pro’s technical specifications are very similar to its predecessor: USB 3.2 with video output, an IR blaster, and Wi-Fi 7. Bluetooth has been updated to version 6.0 and now supports Auracast, which is something Honor refers to as “audio sharing” in the settings.

However, UWB is still not on board.

The Honor smartphone comes in a slim, plastic-free outer box. However, the company has provided no information regarding its sustainability. In Europe, the Magic8 Pro will receive both security and version updates for seven years.

User repair is not supported in case of damage.

With Wi-Fi 7, the Magic8 Pro supports the most advanced Wi-Fi standard currently available, covering all three frequency bands. Paired with our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000, data transfer speeds are stable but comparatively slow. Honor will likely address this issue with an update. If this is the case, we will provide updated measurements.

The smartphone supports all of the modern mobile network standards with a wide range of frequencies.

Networking
Honor Magic8 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





976 (min: 951) MBit/s ∼54%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





580 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼39%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1856 (min: 1812) MBit/s ∼99%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





791 (min: 773) MBit/s ∼44%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





834 (min: 647) MBit/s ∼46%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





824 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼55%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1667 (min: 1563) MBit/s ∼89%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1216 (min: 1179) MBit/s ∼67%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼94%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼82%

Vivo X300 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





977 (min: 956) MBit/s ∼54%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





917 (min: 834) MBit/s ∼61%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1866 (min: 1793) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1806 (min: 1725) MBit/s ∼100%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





989 (min: 488) MBit/s ∼55%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





946 (min: 814) MBit/s ∼63%

Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






942 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






1051 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼70%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1280 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1447 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼80%

Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






706 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼39%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






730 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼49%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1303 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼70%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1379 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼76%

050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip

Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1856 (1812-1896)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1667 (1563-1686)

Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø790 (773-809)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1215 (1179-1261)

Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø976 (951-1002)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (647-963)

Honor Magic8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø579 (475-641)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (780-864)

Outdoors, the GPS fix is ​​quick and accurate. Indoors, however, the performance can be quite inaccurate and fluctuating.

On a bike tour, we compared the Magic8 Pro with the Garmin Venu 2, with the smartphone tracking the route quite accurately, but not as precisely as the fitness smartwatch. For navigation purposes, however, this was perfectly adequate.

The Honor Magic8 Pro can accommodate two nano-SIM cards or up to two eSIMs. The device supports standards such as Wi-Fi calling, VoLTE, and Vo5G.

When held to the ear, the call quality is very natural, and even loud background noise is reliably eliminated. The speakerphone delivers good sound quality, but the microphone range could be somewhat better.

full resolution]“>A selfie with the Honor Magic8 Pro
A selfie with the Honor Magic8 Pro

The Honor Magic8 Pro’s front camera delivers high-resolution images, utilizes pixel binning, and employs a 3D depth sensor for focus assistance. This results in attractive selfies that boast a high level of detail and sharpness. Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 4K/60fps, but then appear somewhat over-processed. A reduced frame rate of 30fps allows for more detailed recordings.

With the main camera, Honor has removed the variable aperture from the Magic7 Pro (f/1.4 – f/2.0), with the Magic8 Pro using a fixed aperture of f/1.6. What is new, however, is the optical image stabilization with CIPA 5.5, which we are already familiar with from Vivo X300 Pro. We have also conducted a photo comparison with both smartphones. 

Our tests revealed impressive image quality, delivering attractive shots with a pleasing level of detail. However, the default settings result in images that are significantly brightened, and colors are oversaturated. Users who prefer a different look can adjust this in the settings.

The ultra-wide-angle lens delivers acceptable results and also functions as a macro lens. However, the depth of field and detail towards the edges are somewhat soft.

The optimized periscope zoom produces good photos that are sufficient for most needs, even in low light. A maximum magnification of 100x is achievable, which can be optionally enhanced by AI. This often works quite well with objects, but less so with people or more complex subjects.

Videos are recorded in Ultra HD at up to 120fps and benefit from good image stabilization. We were also impressed with the recorded audio.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light

orginal image

click to load images

ColorChecker

6.2 ∆E

5 ∆E

8.9 ∆E

5.9 ∆E

6.3 ∆E

3.1 ∆E

3.8 ∆E

7.6 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

8.2 ∆E

1 ∆E

3.9 ∆E

7.4 ∆E

3.8 ∆E

3.8 ∆E

2.4 ∆E

6.9 ∆E

8 ∆E

4.6 ∆E

3 ∆E

3.5 ∆E

7.8 ∆E

7.8 ∆E

6.7 ∆E

ColorChecker Honor Magic8 Pro: 5.55 ∆E min: 0.99 – max: 8.94 ∆E
ColorChecker

18.6 ∆E

23.3 ∆E

22.7 ∆E

20.9 ∆E

26.5 ∆E

31.1 ∆E

23.7 ∆E

19.6 ∆E

19.2 ∆E

21.9 ∆E

29.4 ∆E

31.1 ∆E

17.4 ∆E

26.5 ∆E

16.7 ∆E

28.3 ∆E

23.7 ∆E

25.2 ∆E

28.4 ∆E

28.5 ∆E

31.7 ∆E

24.5 ∆E

18.6 ∆E

11.6 ∆E

ColorChecker Honor Magic8 Pro: 23.72 ∆E min: 11.65 – max: 31.71 ∆E

The Honor Magic8 Pro only comes with a USB-C cable and a SIM card tool. Power adapters and protective cases must be purchased separately and can be found on various online stores such as Amazon. 

The warranty in Germany covers 24 months.

The Magic8 Pro’s capacitive touchscreen is smooth to the touch and offers precise input. An ultrasonic fingerprint sensor is integrated into the display, and it unlocks the smartphone quickly, boasting a high recognition rate. Additionally, the Honor smartphone remains the only one of its kind running Android to offer 3D face recognition, which is also speedy, accurate, and secure.

The new AI button visually resembles the iPhone’s camera button, but its functionality also includes the iPhone’s action button, allowing it to distinguish between three different press gestures. Each of these can be assigned a different function. By default, a long press launches an AI overview, displaying the choice between AI reminders and Circle to Search. The latter can be accessed in a less cumbersome way, and it can be customized extensively in the settings.

The linear vibration motor delivers crisp and, if desired, very distinct feedback.

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The 6.71-inch (17.04 cm) OLED screen displays sharp images, supports all HDR standards, and can adjust the refresh rate between 1 and 120 Hz.

The peak brightness of just over 6,000 cd/m² is achieved exclusively with HDR content, but even when it comes to smaller white areas (APL18: 3,233 cd/m²), the Magic8 Pro maintains high levels of brightness.

High-frequency PWM dimming makes the panel a comparatively eye-friendly OLED among its peers. However, due to the 120 Hz base frequency, discomfort cannot be completely ruled out for users sensitive to such issues. Honor also includes numerous other features to protect the user’s eyes and can even counteract motion sickness.

1863
cd/m²
1816
cd/m²
1789
cd/m²
1869
cd/m²
1809
cd/m²
1778
cd/m²
1858
cd/m²
1812
cd/m²
1793
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1869 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1820.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.07 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 1809 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.77}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6446 K

Honor Magic8 Pro
OLED, 2808×1256, 6.7″
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
OLED, 2622×1206, 6.3″
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120×1440, 6.9″
Vivo X300 Pro
AMOLED, 2800×1260, 6.8″
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
AMOLED, 2608×1200, 6.9″
Honor Magic7 Pro
OLED, 2800×1280, 6.8″
Screen

-21%

-49%

-7%

-4%

8%

Brightness middle (cd/m²)

1809

1059

-41%

1357

-25%

1574

-13%

1771

-2%

1607

-11%

Brightness (cd/m²)

1821

1060

-42%

1350

-26%

1562

-14%

1773

-3%

1609

-12%

Brightness Distribution (%)

95

99

4%

94

-1%

93

-2%

99

4%

95

0%

Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *

1.2

1.3

-8%

3.1

-158%

1.3

-8%

1.3

-8%

0.9

25%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

2.9

3.6

-24%

4.7

-62%

2.7

7%

2.8

3%

1.8

38%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

1.8

2.1

-17%

2.2

-22%

2

-11%

2.1

-17%

1.7

6%

Gamma

2.22 99%

2.2 100%

2 110%

2.26 97%

2.25 98%

2.24 98%

CCT

6446 101%

6542 99%

6391 102%

6709 97%

6452 101%

6346 102%

* … smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


3519 cd/m² +9%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


3233 cd/m²

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


3044 cd/m² -6%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


2613 cd/m² -19%

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


2329 cd/m² -28%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


1634 cd/m² -49%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


6045 cd/m²

Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


4697 cd/m² -22%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


3458 cd/m² -43%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


2997 cd/m² -50%

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


2785 cd/m² -54%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


2768 cd/m² -54%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 12.82 %
Secondary Frequency: 4347 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8083 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

A series of measurements with a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness appears flat, but this is due to the scaling. The enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness can be seen in the info box.)

In our tests, we achieved the most natural color reproduction when the Professional color mode was selected together with the Warm color temperature setting. Although the Calman measurements were then slightly worse than with the predecessor, this difference was imperceptible to the naked eye.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
1.04 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.5055 ms rise
↘ 0.536 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.63 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.324 ms rise
↘ 0.306 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms).

Outdoors, the Honor Magic8 Pro was very impressive and remained easily readable in all situations. The only thing missing is an anti-reflective screen.

The panel’s viewing angle stability is excellent, and the brightness only dropped slightly at wide viewing angles.

Das Honor Magic8 Pro is powered by the very up-to-date Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, which is responsible for excellent performance. The smartphone also delivers very good results in benchmarks in terms of peak performance. However, it is unable to maintain this level over the long term (see temperature).

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288


3803 Points +2%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


3718 Points

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


3676 Points -1%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (3498 – 3831, n=10)





3669 Points -1%

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


3562 Points -4%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


3200 Points -14%

Average of class Smartphone
  (196 – 3883, n=214, last 2 years)





1795 Points -52%

Multi-Core
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


11301 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (10620 – 12383, n=10)





11182 Points -1%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


11004 Points -3%

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


10615 Points -6%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288


10097 Points -11%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


10020 Points -11%

Average of class Smartphone
  (830 – 11634, n=214, last 2 years)





5255 Points -53%

PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


22179 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (18445 – 28557, n=8)





20978 Points -5%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


20764 Points -6%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


18445 Points -17%

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


17480 Points -21%

Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 – 28557, n=186, last 2 years)





14942 Points -33%

CrossMark – Overall
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


2722 Points

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


2598 Points -5%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


2354 Points -14%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1698 – 2722, n=7)





2310 Points -15%

Average of class Smartphone
  (187 – 2722, n=122, last 2 years)





1175 Points -57%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


15734 Points

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


14678 Points -7%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (7945 – 16690, n=9)





13739 Points -13%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


13325 Points -15%

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


10620 Points -33%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 – 16690, n=150, last 2 years)





7853 Points -50%

System
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


20996 Points +4%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


20150 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (9356 – 21153, n=9)





18668 Points -7%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


17171 Points -15%

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


15639 Points -22%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 – 21153, n=150, last 2 years)





11617 Points -42%

Memory
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


22887 Points

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


18501 Points -19%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


17355 Points -24%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (6789 – 24052, n=9)





17053 Points -25%

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


13155 Points -43%

Average of class Smartphone
  (962 – 24052, n=150, last 2 years)





8952 Points -61%

Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (41267 – 61797, n=9)





52025 Points +1%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


51530 Points 0%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


51366 Points

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


45562 Points -11%

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


26660 Points -48%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 – 384996, n=150, last 2 years)





26630 Points -48%

Web
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


2587 Points

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


2322 Points -10%

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


2319 Points -10%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


2319 Points -10%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1561 – 2587, n=9)





2239 Points -13%

Average of class Smartphone
  (858 – 2587, n=150, last 2 years)





1720 Points -34%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288


5143 Points +510%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


843 Points

Average of class Smartphone
  (80 – 5210, n=64, last 2 years)





777 Points -8%

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


733 Points -13%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (511 – 843, n=9)





639 Points -24%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


559 Points -34%

Half Precision NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288


35890 Points +4157%

Average of class Smartphone
  (80 – 36297, n=64, last 2 years)





3234 Points +284%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


843 Points

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


718 Points -15%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (486 – 843, n=9)





617 Points -27%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


561 Points -33%

Quantized NPU 1.5
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro, A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, 12288


49889 Points +2412%

Average of class Smartphone
  (133 – 49889, n=64, last 2 years)





4710 Points +137%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


1986 Points

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


1631 Points -18%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (974 – 1986, n=9)





1350 Points -32%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


1285 Points -35%

AI Benchmark – Score V6
Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 12288


22780 Points

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500, Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, 16384


21660 Points -5%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384


19229 Points -16%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
  (1098 – 22780, n=6)





15134 Points -34%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


10621 Points -53%

Average of class Smartphone
  (55.6 – 22780, n=77, last 2 years)





5293 Points -77%

Die Adreno 840 liefert Grafikpower pur, unterstützt Raytracing und zeigt im Test Spitzenergebnisse.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


8102 Points

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


7629 Points -6%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


6959 Points -14%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


6907 Points -15%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


5928 Points -27%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


8072 Points

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


7582 Points -6%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


7021 Points -13%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


6845 Points -15%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


6001 Points -26%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


30621 Points +2%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


30166 Points

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


26944 Points -11%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


26614 Points -12%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


26286 Points -13%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


14869 Points +5%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


14225 Points

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


13036 Points -8%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


12395 Points -13%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


11442 Points -20%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


15420 Points +8%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


14331 Points

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


12711 Points -11%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


12242 Points -15%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


12194 Points -15%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


3208 Points +4%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


3081 Points

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


2704 Points -12%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


2630 Points -15%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


2397 Points -22%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


3253 Points +5%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


3101 Points

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


2736 Points -12%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


2698 Points -13%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


2651 Points -15%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


121 fps +1%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


60 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


937 fps +2%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


917 fps

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


754 fps -18%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


713 fps -22%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


579 fps -37%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


121 fps +1%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


531 fps

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


472 fps -11%

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


441 fps -17%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


415 fps -22%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


341 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


121 fps +1%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


60 fps -50%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


399 fps

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


346 fps -13%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


343 fps -14%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


286 fps -28%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


284 fps -29%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


121 fps +1%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


104 fps -13%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


239 fps

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


210 fps -12%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


198 fps -17%

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


193 fps -19%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


161 fps -33%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


121 fps +1%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


100 fps -17%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


127 fps

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps -6%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


114 fps -10%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


107 fps -16%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


87 fps -31%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


120 fps 0%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


120 fps 0%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


60 fps -50%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


367 fps +2%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


361 fps

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


296 fps -18%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


253 fps -30%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


237 fps -34%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


62 fps +7%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


58 fps

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


52 fps -10%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


50 fps -14%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


37 fps -36%

Jetstream 2 – 2.2 Total Score
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)


479.804 Points

Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)


469.169 Points -2%

Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)


362.318 Points -24%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (2 – 480, n=5)





265 Points -45%

Average of class Smartphone (2 – 480, n=52, last 2 years)





224 Points -53%

WebXPRT 4 – Overall
Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)


302 Points +40%

Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)


255 Points +18%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)


236 Points +9%

Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)


216 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 – 278, n=7)





171.3 Points -21%

Average of class Smartphone (27 – 306, n=144, last 2 years)





147.2 Points -32%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)


124 Points -43%

Octane V2 – Total Score
Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)


126661 Points

Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)


119218 Points -6%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)


99202 Points -22%

Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)


96438 Points -24%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (50987 – 126661, n=7)





84253 Points -33%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)


58421 Points -54%

Average of class Smartphone (2228 – 126661, n=195, last 2 years)





49588 Points -61%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 – Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 – 28190, n=155, last 2 years)





1141 ms * -301%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra (Chrome 143)


522.8 ms * -84%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 – 635, n=8)





421 ms * -48%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Chrome 132)


376.8 ms * -32%

Vivo X300 Pro (Chrome 142)


373.8 ms * -31%

Honor Magic8 Pro (Chrome 143)


284.4 ms *

Apple iPhone 17 Pro (Safari Mobile 26.0)


270.4 ms * +5%

* … smaller is better

Honor Magic8 Pro Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra Vivo X300 Pro Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Honor Magic7 Pro Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5

-25%

-32%

6%

-21%

-15%

-43%

Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)

3942.69

3823.28

-3%

2041.82

-48%

4064.33

3%

3910.81

-1%

Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)

3732.81

3361.24

-10%

1981.85

-47%

3987.65

7%

3683.81

-1%

3234 1240 – 4035, n=27)

-13%

Random Read 4KB (MB/s)

488.67

287.85

-41%

320.25

-34%

575.86

18%

282.34

-42%

393 279 – 576, n=27)

-20%

Random Write 4KB (MB/s)

587.11

331.61

-44%

593.74

1%

551.82

-6%

357.04

-39%

456 48.2 – 689, n=27)

-22%

The Magic8 Pro’s surface temperatures remain safe at all times, even under sustained load, and don’t even reach 44 °C in some areas.

The SoC’s cooling system struggled to cope with the heat generated during stress tests, which resulted in a performance loss of approximately 50%.

  42.1 °C
108 F
42.6 °C
109 F
42.1 °C
108 F
 
  40.2 °C
104 F
42.4 °C
108 F
42 °C
108 F
 
  38.2 °C
101 F
41.8 °C
107 F
39.3 °C
103 F
 
Maximum: 42.6 °C = 109 F
Average: 41.2 °C = 106 F
39.7 °C
103 F
41 °C
106 F
43.2 °C
110 F
38.5 °C
101 F
40.2 °C
104 F
40.8 °C
105 F
38.4 °C
101 F
39.8 °C
104 F
39.4 °C
103 F
Maximum: 43.2 °C = 110 F
Average: 40.1 °C = 104 F

Room Temperature 20.6 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


99.7 % +99%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


57.6 % +15%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


54.9 % +10%

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


52.3 % +5%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


50 %

Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


73.5 % +45%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


52.3 % +3%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


50.7 %

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


50.3 % -1%

Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


76.8 % +49%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


51.6 %

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


49.7 % -4%

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


49.5 % -4%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


% -100%

Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


68.4 % +41%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe


65.8 % +36%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


50.6 % +5%

Honor Magic8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


48.4 %

Vivo X300 Pro
Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash


47 % -3%

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip

Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø29.9 (22-43.5)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.2 (26.9-36.7)

Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø27.3 (21.9-43.5)

Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø98.4 (78.1-156.3)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø60 (59.8-60)

Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø88.6 (69.3-132.4)

Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14.1 (10.3-21.3)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability: Ø15.4 (13.4-20.4)

Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø14 (11-23.3)

Honor Magic8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø30 (21.5-41.7)

Apple iPhone 17 Pro A19 Pro 6-Core GPU, A19 Pro, Apple 512GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability: Ø33.4 (31-40.3)

Vivo X300 Pro Mali-G1 Ultra MC12, Dimensity 9500, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø29.1 (23.9-48.2)

The Honor smartphone’s two speakers’ main aim is to deliver a spatial sound experience with plenty of depth using AI algorithms. At medium volume, they’re quite successful in achieving this goal, and the result is an appealing sound stage. However, at full volume, the treble distorts quite noticeably at times.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.838.92529.6323119.342.14025.3415033.341.86320.748.48023.849.610018.448.812515.25216011.956.62001557.125011.758.231511.762.440010.164.45009.871.163010.872.880011.376.7100011.379.5125012.382.9160011.778.4200011.382.225001282.7315012.283400012.885500013.182.4630013.380.3800013.376.71000013.476.51250013.368.11600012.962.7SPL24.493.1N0.598median 12.2median 76.7Delta1.39.736.941.135.428.527.523.228.430.629.839.423.227.519.53619.445.620.150.917.660.618.457.515.557.912.75811.461.612.965.311.765.511.369.312.274.213.174.915.176.113.179.81379.413.376.713.378.113.377.313.676.413.673.513.67713.771.91459.125.488.40.774.6median 13.3median 73.51.18hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

The Magic8 Pro’s power consumption is comparatively low, which, when paired with its 6,270 mAh battery, should promise excellent battery life. Unfortunately, the battery in the European version is smaller; the Chinese version boasts a 7,200 mAh battery and faster charging capabilities.

Wired charging in the reviewed version is possible at up to 100 watts, with a full charge taking 36 minutes (50%: 14 minutes).

Honor Magic8 Pro
6270 mAh
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
3988 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
Vivo X300 Pro
5440 mAh
Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
6500 mAh
Honor Magic7 Pro
5270 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption

-70%

-17%

-84%

-31%

-54%

-34%

-43%

Idle Minimum * (Watt)

0.58

0.56

3%

0.55

5%

0.86

-48%

0.87

-50%

0.94

-62%

0.798 0.58 – 1.2, n=8)

-38%

Idle Average * (Watt)

0.74

1.78

-141%

0.77

-4%

1.8

-143%

1.29

-74%

1.5

-103%

1.283 0.74 – 2.13, n=8)

-73%

Idle Maximum * (Watt)

0.75

1.89

-152%

0.91

-21%

1.86

-148%

1.33

-77%

1.57

-109%

1.52 0.75 – 2.18, n=8)

-103%

Load Average * (Watt)

11.35

12.36

-9%

13.81

-22%

10.63

6%

8.84

22%

11.03

3%

7.08 4.2 – 11.4, n=7)

38%

Load Maximum * (Watt)

11.87

17.69

-49%

16.69

-41%

21.99

-85%

9.15

23%

11.68

2%

* … smaller is better

01234567891011Tooltip

Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.54 (0.614-11.8)

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.37 (0.963-9.17)

Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.557 (0.4958-0.791)

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)

01234567891011Tooltip

Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.8 (11.5-11.9)

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.08 (9.02-9.14)

Honor Magic8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.557 (0.4958-0.791)

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.983 (0.9-1.319)

The Honor Magic 8 Pro achieved very good battery runtimes in the battery test.

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 143) 26h 52min
Review: Honor Magic8 Pro
Review: Honor Magic8 Pro

The Honor Magic8 Pro presents itself as a worthy successor with a brighter OLED display, strong performance and lengthy software support, but in Europe, you’ll have to accept compromises in battery size and storage options.

Honor Magic8 Pro
– 01/13/2026 v8

Daniel Schmidt

Connectivity

68 / 69 → 98%

Games Performance

40 / 55 → 72%

Application Performance

89 / 85 → 100%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
92.4%

Repairability
20%

Software Updates
100%

Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 52.1%

Image

Model / Review

Price

Weight

Drive

Display

1.

89.3%

Honor Magic8 Pro

Honor Magic8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.99
Natbok 2 Pack 3D Compatible …
2. $11.88
[5 Pack] Screen Protector fo…
3. $6.87
GUYAHANYER 3-Pack Screen Pro…
List Price: 1300€
219 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.71″
2808×1256
458 PPI
OLED

2.

89.9%

Apple iPhone 17 Pro

Apple iPhone 17 Pro
Apple A19 Pro ⎘
Apple A19 Pro 6-Core GPU ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $48.99
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone…
2. $49.00
Apple iPhone 17 Pro Silicone…
3. $9.89
Ailun 3 Pack Screen Protecto…
List Price: 1549€
206 g Apple 512GB NVMe 6.30″
2622×1206
458 PPI
OLED

3.

89.4%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. 
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, 25…
2. $1,154.50
Samsung Galaxy ​S25 Ultra …
3. $1,299.99
SAMSUNG Galaxy S25 Ultra SM-…
List Price: 1449€
218 g 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.90″
3120×1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X

4.

88.1%

Vivo X300 Pro

Vivo X300 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 9500 ⎘
Arm Mali G1- Ultra MC12 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V…
2. $7.99
Lucyliy (3 Pack) Compatible …
3. $9.91
MAOUICI Tempered Glass for V…
List Price: 1399€
226 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.78″
2800×1260
453 PPI
AMOLED

5.

88.2%

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra

Xiaomi Poco F8 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $10.79
Ibywind for Xiaomi Poco F8 U…
2. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi POCO F8 U…
3. $12.99
Suttkue for POCO F8 Ultra Sc…
List Price: 900€
220 g 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash 6.90″
2608×1200
416 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Daniel Schmidt, 2026-01-15 (Update: 2026-01-15)

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *